Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Mathematical statistics --- Semiology. Diagnosis. Symptomatology --- Research --- Data Interpretation, Statistical --- Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) --- Survival Analysis --- WA 950 Theory or methods of medical statistics --- Medicine --- -Meta-analysis --- Meta-analysis --- -610 --- Psychometrics --- Social sciences --- Clinical sciences --- Medical profession --- Human biology --- Life sciences --- Medical sciences --- Pathology --- Physicians --- -Evaluation --- Evaluation --- Statistical methods --- 610 --- Research&delete& --- Health Workforce

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

A considerable number of journal publications using a range of qualitative synthesis approaches has been published. Mary Dixon-Woods and colleagues (Mary Dixon-Woods, Booth, & Sutton, 2007) identified 42 qualitative evidence synthesis papers published in health care literature between 1990 and 2004. An ongoing update by Hannes and Macaitis (2010)identified around 100 additional qualitative or mixed methods syntheses. Yet these generally lack a clear, detailed description of what was done and why (Greenhalgh et al, 2007; McInnes & Wimpenny, 2008) . Choices are most commonly influenced by what others have successfully used in the past or by a particular school of thought (Atkins et al, 2008; Britten et al, 2002). This is a substantive limitation.This book brings balance to the options available to researchers, including approaches that have not had a substantial uptake among researchers. It provides arguments for when and why researchers or other parties of interest should opt for a certain approach to synthesis, which challenges they might face in adopting it and what the potential strengths and weaknesses are compared with other approaches.This book acts as a resource for readers who would otherwise have to piece together the methodology from a range of journal articles. In addition, it should stimulate further development and documentation of synthesis methodology in a field that is characterized by diversity.

Qualitative Research --- Methods --- Research --- Medicine --- Biomedical Research --- W 20.5 Medical research (General) --- #SBIB:303H30 --- Kwalitatieve methoden: algemeen --- Biology --- Qualitative research --- Qualitative analysis (Research) --- Qualitative methods (Research) --- Clinical sciences --- Medical profession --- Human biology --- Life sciences --- Medical sciences --- Pathology --- Physicians --- Biomass --- Life (Biology) --- Natural history --- Research&delete& --- Methodology --- Health Workforce --- Meta-Analysis as Topic. --- Qualitative Research. --- Qualitative research. --- Methodology. --- Methods. --- kvalitative forskningsmetoder --- evidensbaseret medicin --- systematiske oversigtsartikler --- systematic reviews --- mixed method --- kvantitativ forskning

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (formerly the Reviewers' Handbook) is the official document which describes in detail the process of creating Cochrane systematic reviews.

Evidence-Based Medicine --- Meta-Analysis as Topic --- Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) --- Review Literature as Topic --- State-of-the-Art Reviews --- State-of-the-Art Review --- Review, State-of-the-Art --- Reviews, State-of-the-Art --- State of the Art Review --- State of the Art Reviews --- Donabedian Model --- Donabedian Triad --- Outcome and Process Assessment --- Structure Process Outcome Triad --- Model, Donabedian --- Triad, Donabedian --- methods --- Overviews, Clinical Trial --- Clinical Trial Overviews --- Data Pooling --- Clinical Trial Overview --- Data Poolings --- Meta Analysis as Topic --- Overview, Clinical Trial --- Evidence-based medicine --- Medicine --- Meta-analysis --- Outcome assessment (Medical care) --- Assessment of outcome (Medical care) --- Outcome evaluation (Medical care) --- Outcome measures (Medical care) --- Outcomes assessment (Medical care) --- Outcomes measurement (Medical care) --- Outcomes research (Medical care) --- Patient outcome assessment --- Medical care --- Psychometrics --- Social sciences --- Clinical sciences --- Medical profession --- Human biology --- Life sciences --- Medical sciences --- Pathology --- Physicians --- EBM (Medicine) --- Evidence-based healthcare --- Clinical medicine --- Systematic reviews (Medical research) --- Clinical Trials as Topic --- Statistics as Topic --- Models, Statistical --- Methodology --- Research&delete& --- Evaluation --- Research --- Statistical methods --- Decision making --- Meta-Analysis as Topic. --- Meta-analysis. --- Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care). --- Outcome assessment (Medical care). --- Review Literature as Topic. --- methods. --- Methodology. --- Evaluation. --- #SBIB:303H0 --- #SBIB:303H12 --- Methoden in de sociale wetenschappen: algemeen --- Methoden en technieken: sociale wetenschappen --- Quantitative methods in social research --- Human medicine --- evidence-based methodiek --- Cochrane Collaboration --- Philosophy of science --- General ethics --- Theory of knowledge --- Meta-Analysis. --- WB 102 Clinical medicine --- Handbooks --- Review --- Special queries --- Médecine factuelle --- Médecine --- Evaluation des résultats (Soins médicaux) --- Méthodologie --- Recherche --- Health Workforce --- Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care. --- Evidence-based medicine - Methodology. --- Medicine - Research - Evaluation. --- Evidence-Based Medicine - methods. --- Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care